A developer shares concrete ways he's using AI to handle real-world information tasks—from extracting facts across large datasets to managing school documents and trip logistics—and notes that cheaper, faster models have made it frictionless to try AI solutions for routine problems.

• AI has crossed a threshold from "somewhat useful" to "reliably handles unstructured data tasks" like extracting calendar dates from school documents or gathering trip information, though he still spot-checks critical details.
• Cheaper and faster models remove the friction that used to make AI solutions feel like overkill—the difference between spending $50 and three hours versus $5 and 30 minutes changes what feels worth trying.
• AI still falls short on high-judgment questions (like "what books should I read?") and won't replace the top-tier work of a personal assistant, only the lower-judgment data management parts.

The article discusses how the rise of AI tools, particularly LLMs, has affected software engineering and data work. While some engineers are concerned about the declining quality of code, data professionals find value in these tools for generating quick, low-maintenance solutions. It emphasizes the need for careful evaluation of the new data generated by these systems.

• Fast, disposable code from LLMs isn't a problem for data work the way it is for engineers building long-term systems, since data scientists often throw away code after one use anyway
• LLMs are genuinely useful for building data extraction tools (e.g., pulling usable data from messy PDFs), unlocking previously inaccessible data sources with minimal effort
• Using LLMs to generate synthetic data is risky and shouldn't replace real human data, especially in user experience research
• As LLMs improve at generating and explaining code, data professionals need less hand-holding from software engineers for low-risk coding tasks, shrinking the traditional divide between the two roles